- Option : C
- Explanation : Conflicts between the NPV decision and IRR are due to the scale/size of the project or the different cash flows pattern. Since the size is the same the difference in cash flows will cause the conflict.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

- Option : A
- Explanation : The IRR would stay the same because both the initial outlay and the after-tax cash flows halve, so that the return on each dollar invested remains the same. All of the cash flows and their present values also reduce in half. The difference between the total present value of the future cash flows and the initial outlay (the NPV) also halves.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Cash Flows | |||||||

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | NPV | IRR(%) |

Project A | -50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 17.77 | 21.79 |

Project B | -50 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 15.02 | 27.18 |

- Option : C
- Explanation : For these projects, a discount rate of 15.09 percent would yield the same
NPV for both (an NPV of 11.03). The cross over point needs to be before the
lower IRR (21.79).

Note: The discount rate (crossover point) at which both the projects have the same NPV is the IRR for the differences in cash flows of the projects. For instance, in this case, it is CF0 = 0, CF1 = -22, CF2 = -22, CF3 = -22, CF4 = 88, CPT IRR. IRR = 15.09%.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

5. Katrina Lowry is facing multiple IRRs problem regarding an upcoming project.

Year | 0 | 1 | 2 |

Cashflows | -1.6 | 10 | -10 |

- Option : C
- Explanation :

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.