Statement: The disparities between the problems of rich and the poor do not stand out clearly when we compare the attitude of the law making bodies towards these two strata of the society.
Con. I: Parliament do not discriminate between rich and.poor while formulating policies for them.
Con.II: Law makers do not have identical attitude towards the haves and have nots.
| A. | only conclusion I follows |
| B. | only conclusion II follows. |
| C. | both I and II follow |
| D. | neither I nor II follows |
|
Option: A Explanation : Study the attitude of parliamentarians towards rich and poor separately. If it is identical then it will be difficult to distinguish rich and poor on the basis of their problems. Click on Discuss to view users comments. |
Statement: In a police encounter 5 terrorist and 2 soldiers were killed and one injured seriously.
Con. I: The clash was not unexpected.
Con.II: The only injured was the terrorist.
| A. | only conclusion I follows |
| B. | only conclusion II follows. |
| C. | both I and II follow |
| D. | neither I nor II follows |
|
Option: D Explanation : Encounters are always unexpected, and the persons who was injured among them, may either be a soldier or a terrorist. Click on Discuss to view users comments. |
Statement: Now you need not have an import licence to own a software computer today.
Con. I: Computer softwares are made indigenously.
Con.II: Duty free computers are now available.
| A. | only conclusion I follows |
| B. | only conclusion II follows. |
| C. | both I and II follow |
| D. | neither I nor II follows |
|
Option: D Explanation : Liberalization does not necessarily mean that people have started producing computers indegenously and custom duty and import licence are not identical in nature. Click on Discuss to view users comments. |
Statement: Good is the enemy of best.
Con. I: You should be good to your best enemy.
Con.II: Best do not like the good.
| A. | only conclusion I follows |
| B. | only conclusion II follows. |
| C. | both I and II follow |
| D. | neither I nor II follows |
|
Option: D Explanation : Conclusion I and II both are not implied, e.g., if we don't like someone it does not mean that we are enemy of that person. Click on Discuss to view users comments. |
Statement: Whereabout of my brother is not known since he left this place last year by that unlucky bus which collided with a truck near Faizabad.
Con. I: My brother was killed in the accident.
Con.II: Collision of the bus and the truck is the reason behind my brother's missing.
| A. | only conclusion I follows |
| B. | only conclusion II follows. |
| C. | both I and II follow |
| D. | neither of P or Q is true |
|
Option: C Explanation : I and II both the conclusions probably follow from the statement. Click on Discuss to view users comments. |
